Once companies expand internationally, it makes sense to centralize certain management, administrative and technical services in one place. Centralized services can significantly reduce costs and allow organizations to standardize processes and procedures. However, companies that expand internationally may not prioritize what is often seen as a purely tax issue. Some intercompany services need to be treated separately because they have a higher value. Excluded services include: Employees: Not all private companies have sufficiently trained and experienced accounting staff to properly handle intercompany transactions. For example, one company we know had nine wholly-owned subsidiaries. The parent company demonstrated that Subsidiary No. 1 owed it $105,000 on the debtor`s trial balance. Company #1 demonstrated that it owed the parent company $5,000 in its accounts payable. We showed this problem to the accounting staff of the parent company and asked about the $100,000 gap.

The employee told us that she did not know what amount was correct. The following question was asked of the business owner who was looking to obtain a loan from a bank: “How can a bank have confidence in the accuracy of your financial statements if your accounting staff cannot accurately capture transactions in your own businesses?” According to Audit Analytics, intercompany issuances were the fifth reason for reformulation and were in the top quartile between 2001 and 2014. A Center of Excellence is a group of corporate tax, finance, IT, and treasury professionals who globally understand the accounting and technology associated with internal accounting. Cross-functional integration is essential. Intra-group accounting should be part of the performance evaluations for group members who oversee the implementation of the standardized global policy and the provision of tools and capabilities to maintain it. Read this ebook to learn how forward-thinking – and active – companies have implemented new business-to-business processes that improve transparency, accuracy and efficiency. Most companies tend to have a page or two with very high-level guidelines for intercompany accounting. These guidelines lack the detail and depth to specify the type of coding required to coordinate ERP systems around the world. Modernizing your intercompany accounting process leads to greater productivity and detects accounting errors before they lead to devastating financial representations. It allows your teams to perform continuous, real-time analysis of global business-to-business execution and present the CFO and controller with the information they need at any time. The hub enables organizational units and business units to create, approve, review, and reconcile intercompany transactions and net settlement balances between currencies and regions in real time, providing a high level of efficiency, transparency, and trust. Setting up a service debit system carries tax risks, especially during the first implementation.

Tax authorities may and regularly prohibit deductions for cross-border service charges. When a company is unable to prove the benefits of the services provided or the amount charged, taxpayers face an uphill battle to appeal. While a multinational can provide evidence to defend its position during an audit, these documents are often dismissed as inadequate if collected long after the fee has been paid. With multiple stakeholders, large transaction volumes, complex corporate agreements, and increased regulatory oversight, it`s painfully clear that intra-group accounting requires an end-to-end structured process. Collaboration on accounting, taxation, and treasury can also make it easier to resolve issues, especially if the legal entities involved in corporate accounting follow a framework of standardized global policies that govern the organization`s critical areas. Tax authorities around the world are certainly concerned that multinational companies are charging fees for intercompany services. Intercompany service fees reduce the amount of taxable income in the recipient country and increase the taxable profits of the company providing the services. No wonder auditors keep a suspicious eye on management fee payments disclosed on a company`s tax return. The tax situation can worsen if foreign affiliates are profitable in their home countries, while U.S.

operations reflect losses. It is possible that spending in the U.S. is really supporting operations abroad. Under Section 482, the IRS has the power to reallocate income and deductions between related party taxpayers to reflect what it considers to be the true economic nature of the cross-border activity. Contact PIASCIK today to find out how accounting for intercompany transactions can benefit you and your business. Your initial consultation is absolutely FREE without you having to commit. Our first class services are available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. We even offer a flat fee with no hidden fees. No other international tax firm is as committed, experienced and reliable as PIASCIK. Inappropriate or inadequate intra-group accounting practices are partly to blame. As tax authorities look at intercompany service payments, we see that many companies are well positioned to improve global cash flow with a new look at cross-border fees.

For current U.S. tax regulations for intercompany services between related parties, see Treas. Reg. Section 1.482.9. According to these regulations, the U.S. company would have to charge an independent management fee for the services it provides. While businesses can benefit from intercompany service fees, managing tax risks is a major concern. Definition: An intercompany transaction is a transaction between a parent company and its subsidiaries or other affiliates. A standardized global transfer pricing policy should clearly indicate how a company has met the arm`s length standard, said Todd Izzo, a Deloitte partner specializing in international taxes. Perceived abuses in this area have inspired the recent initiative of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS), which has paid more attention to these cross-border pricing rules. As a result, in some cases, the material arm`s length price provision has been changed, and companies are now required to increase their disclosure of intercompany transactions and financial results.

The IRS recently issued final regulations that adopt the BEPS recommendation of country-by-country reporting requirements for multinational corporations with annual revenues greater than $850 million (see T.D. 9773). The country-specific rules require annual disclosure of income, income, persons, capital, profits and taxes paid for companies in each tax jurisdiction of residence. An intercompany transaction is a transaction between affiliates (i.e. between a parent company and one of its subsidiaries or between subsidiaries of a parent company). Transactions between members of a corporate group must be considered and eliminated for the consolidation of affiliates. The IRS or any other tax authority can certainly question the validity of cross-border payments of intercompany service fees. Taxpayers must prove, among other things, that: Cash: Let`s say the owner of a parent company transfers $100,000 to an affiliate`s bank account. .

. .